Various crafts are represented in the exhibition for sure,
Laura Ellen Bacon’s woven structures and Celia Pym’s darning for example, but
Laura admits to never having woven a basket and you wouldn’t ask Celia to
invisible darn anything. As far as I’m concerned both are artists who use their
craft skills to produce work that reflects movement and narrative,
respectively. Of the ceramicists in the show, Alison Britton makes containers that
are functional but speak of containment, Neil Brownsword highlights the loss of
industrial ceramic skills by making and discarding clay flowers, and Phoebe
Cummings deals with the ephemeral. Andrea Walsh initially studied fine art and
developed the idea of a vessel into her glass boxes, which are sculptural and
jewel like. Emma Woffenden also combines sculpture and glass to create
strangely distorted figures while Laura Youngson Coll makes intricate
biological sculptures (see the picture above). Of the jewellers in the
exhibition, Lin Cheung acknowledges her ideas-based approach while Romilly
Saumarez Smith gives antique finds a new life and narrative by turning them into
jewellery. The other two exhibitors, Caren Hartley who makes bespoke bicycles,
and Peter Marigold who initially studied sculpture but now makes what can
loosely be described as furniture, seem to be more traditional craftspeople
rather than fine artists.
It seems to me that most of these pieces combine craft and
fine art. Does this signify the elision of the line between craftspeople and
fine artists? Are most craftspeople now using their skills to produce work with
conceptual ideas behind it? I doubt they are, as a visit to any gallery would
show. Should we welcome this merging of art and craft? Do these definitions and
categories matter anyway? Should we just enjoy the work whether it is art,
craft or a combination? Food for thought!
No comments:
Post a Comment